As presented in my post from last week, I do not believe the
progress of BIM and its tools and parametric modeling are not going to be the
issue in the building and construction industry. With time the software and hardware issues
will undoubtedly be resolved as well as upgraded and the systems will become
more compatible, as well as user friendly.
And, I do not doubt that drafting in BIM will become a specialty skill
as mentioned by G. Carpenter and required to a certain degree for those in the
industry as mentioned in J. Lancellotti’s post.
The issues that have and will most likely continue to slow down the
progress of BIM are the industry conventions that all groups within the
industry have built their practices around.
This was addressed by our speaker Eric Kuszewski during our week 3
class. He addressed the fact that many
of the building system drawings and efforts were being doubled as a result of
wanting to use BIM to show it one way and then the system engineer or someone else wanting to
see in another way, or the “old” way. He
also addressed that this not only affected the engineers and their products,
but those dealing with the contracts, deliverables, and metrics. The groups that work on the latter have built
what they do around the existing conventions.
As a result, I believe the BIM execution plan that Kuszewski
mentioned will be heavily involved in creating new BIM centered
conventions. I do not believe that in 5
years everything will have completely made the switch to being “BIM-centric,”
but the ability for all those involved to work together to shift from the
practice of making separate drawings for buildings to virtually
creating the building will be much improved as a result of one building era
ending as the beginning of another approaches.
These changes may indeed result in the predictions made by M. Tedesco
regarding the industry in ten and twenty years.
No comments:
Post a Comment