Having
an old-fashioned frame of mind, the use of all of these sensors terrifies
me. John mentions that by 2040, 75% of
cars will be self-driving. That is right
around the time that my children will be learning how to drive. It’s not that I don’t trust technology to do
it’s job, I’m just concerned about the life of the sensors and other technology
behind these self driving cars. A good
majority of people that I know has had issues with the wiring, or the
electronics in their car. Luckily, the
issues have been minor like not being able to put down the window. But the more sensors and wiring that
manufacturers put into vehicles the more probabilistic that something will go
wrong with a major function. If those
sensors would fail on the road, what kind of repercussions will take
place? Don’t get me wrong, the use of
sensor and the technological advances have made our lives easier and more
convenient but I think we need to be careful to what point we take human interaction
with the machine.
Moving
past my concern about the sensors, I find the use of sensors to create a more
efficient building fascinating. Elaborating more on what Elda posted, NASA
designed what they call an Ultra Green Building. Using 5000 sensors on their 50,000 sqft
building they were able to produce a net positive energy building, meaning that
it creates more electricity than needed and puts energy back into the grid. The sensors are wireless making them easy to
manage and place, they measure carbon dioxide levels, temperature, lighting,
and air flow. The use of the sensors
lets the building use 90% less potable water than an average building its size.
Steven
Zornetzer, the associate center director at NASA Ames Research Center, stated
that “[this building] will prove to be one of the highest performing federal
buildings ever.”
The
construction of this building is comparable to others its size. Even with the sophistication of the
construction it only cost 6% more than an average build. It is estimated that the extra expense will
be made up within the first 10 years of energy and maintenance costs. This fact proves that designing a green
building doesn’t have to mean that it is too expensive. The construction world has definitely been
raising its standards through the years with the implementation of LEED. However, I don’t believe LEED will be
effective until it is common sense that we should build that way.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kerryadolan/2012/01/10/nasas-new-sensor-driven-ultra-green-building/
No comments:
Post a Comment